From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  1 09:33:52 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A9437B401
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2003 09:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exchange.wan.no (exchange.wan.no [80.86.128.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AB943FAF
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2003 09:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sten.daniel.sorsdal@wan.no)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 18:32:05 +0200
Message-ID: <0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F1F3E28@exchange.wanglobal.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Suggestion regarding a new option for IPFW2
Thread-Index: AcNYRsp1rLRcBSBjSViDnHjeijH36wAA6BPQ
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= <sten.daniel.sorsdal@wan.no>
To: "Michael Sierchio" <kudzu@tenebras.com>
cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Suggestion regarding a new option for IPFW2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:33:52 -0000

> > I dont see how one could divert unreach host messages when unreach=20
> > host drops the message?
> > It is the error messages generated by IPFW that i am referring to,=20
> > in case that was unclear.
>=20
> You want the source of a an 'unreach' message to be rewritten
> with the destination of the offending packet?  So, a parameter
> to 'unreach' or 'reset' which is an IP address, and could take
> the keyword "dest" or something like that?
>=20
> ipfw add unreach host-prohib ip from any to any auth=20
> src-alias 10.0.0.1
>=20
> or
>=20
> ipfw add unreach host-prohib ip from any to any auth src-alias target
>=20

Yes, like that.

- Sten