Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 19:07:20 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tag day is upon us! Message-ID: <199901201707.TAA85658@greenpeace.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of " Thu, 21 Jan 1999 00:52:19 %2B0800." <199901201652.AAA20877@spinner.netplex.com.au> References: <199901201652.AAA20877@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm wrote: > Mark Murray wrote: > > "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > At some point today, depending on various sleep schedules and > > > whatnot, the tree will branch and 3.1-stable will be created. > > > The HEAD branch will then be known as 4.0-current. > > > > What tag are you going to use? > > The 3.x branch will be RELENG_3. The releases on the branch will be > RELENG_3_1_RELEASE, RELENG_3_2_RELEASE etc. Are you going to do a *_BP tag? > The question is though, what will newvers.sh call it. I'd like it to be > 3.1-BETA, then 3.1-RELEASE, then 3.1-STABLE, and when it's nearly 3.2 > time, we go from 3.1-STABLE to 3.2-BETA. IMHO, we shouldn't use 3.1-STABLE > both before and after 3.1-RELEASE. The last I knew, jkh wasn't too keen > on that though. I'm with you. m.n-STABLE should be post m.n-RELEASE. > SNAP builds do not get affected by this. they are 3.1-YYMMDD-SNAP, and > that is sufficiently unambiguous. Right. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901201707.TAA85658>