Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:12:38 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Integration of ProPolice in FreeBSD Message-ID: <48617F66.6050607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <486174DE.4080307@FreeBSD.org> References: <20080418132749.GB4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200804181945.59189.max@love2party.net> <20080418204738.GE4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20080419071400.GP73016@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20080419074921.GI4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20080420095911.GT5934@hoeg.nl> <f19c444a0804200320ifd64f85tbb19bcdbbb657dbb@mail.gmail.com> <20080423131720.GP92168@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20080609200937.GB72413@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <486174DE.4080307@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > FYI, I did a package build with world built with this patch (but without > adding -fstack-protector to CFLAGS). I didnt notice any problems. This > makes me slightly suspicious, but another hypothesis is that the patch > is in fact safe :-) I'm running a build with CFLAGS += -fstack-protector now...just to see how much chaos will ensue :) Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48617F66.6050607>