From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 10:08:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA8216A403 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F37B13C455 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (yrozoh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l099kYtk095512 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:46:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l099kYd9095511; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:46:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:46:34 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200701090946.l099kYd9095511@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-questions User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:46:39 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE question (nacona vs. pentium4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:08:52 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to write an appropriate CPUTYPE entry for /etc/make.conf for the following machine: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2799.95-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x441d> Logical CPUs per core: 2 I've read the appropriate sections in the make.conf(5) manpage, /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf and even /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk, but they don't really help. So far I've been using "CPUTYPE=pentium4", but I wonder if "nocona" would be better, however I'm not sure if my CPU above qualifies as a nocona one. I think the main difference is that nocona supports SSE3, and SSE3 is indeed listed in the CPU features above, so ... Does anybody know for sure? Thank you very much in advance! Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925