Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:19:33 -0500
From:      Bruce Burden <brucegb@realtime.net>
To:        Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable Users <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?
Message-ID:  <20050609011933.GH20906@tigerfish2.my.domain>
In-Reply-To: <A61058B8-EEA8-41EF-B7DC-DD94D1CC5198@mac.com>
References:  <20050608001306.3FB1F43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42A6C7CE.9000002@incubus.de> <200506080908.02478.fcash@ocis.net> <42A71AE1.8020300@incubus.de> <6.2.1.2.0.20050608134054.06b8ccb0@64.7.153.2> <42A73293.5000105@incubus.de> <A61058B8-EEA8-41EF-B7DC-DD94D1CC5198@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:04:20PM -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
>
> However, it's common to find half-decent hardware RAID functionality  
> on many x86 and AMD64 motherboards, and PCI-based RAID cards are not  
> very expensive.
>
	Of course, asr() isn't 64 bit safe, so that can throw a 
   wrinkle into the AMD64 story... :-/

	And, yeah, I have considered volunteering for this. 

							Bruce
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  "I like bad!"                         Bruce Burden    Austin, TX.
        - Thuganlitha
        The Power and the Prophet
        Robert Don Hughes




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050609011933.GH20906>