Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Stable production version.
Message-ID:  <1343221644538-5729739.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120725194717.550d0603@AMD620.ovitrap.com>
References:  <BAY170-W1663C21603F489541F2C4F9AC30@phx.gbl> <500FD659.4090106@my.gd> <20120725194717.550d0603@AMD620.ovitrap.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
8.3 or 9.1.

Using 9.0 when 9.1 is behind the corner
is going backwards IMHO.

or 9-STABLE if you want your system
evolving up to release, which is nice 
because you can catch and solve all
possible problems one at the time, 
and not be overwhelmed upgrading
only to RELEASE.



--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Stable-production-version-tp5729696p5729739.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1343221644538-5729739.post>