From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 12:00:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480FA16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:00:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3604743D39 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9RC0llE041055 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:00:47 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9RC0ln9041051; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:00:47 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:00:47 GMT Message-Id: <200410271200.i9RC0ln9041051@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: kern/72979: unkillable process(es) stuck in `STOP' state X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mikhail Teterin List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:00:47 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/72979; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin To: Ken Smith Cc: David Xu , Mikhail Teterin , Michael Nottebrock , re@freebsd.org, davidxu@t2t2.com, davidxu@viatech.com.cn, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/72979: unkillable process(es) stuck in `STOP' state Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:58:44 -0400 On Tuesday 26 October 2004 10:53 pm, Ken Smith wrote: = % gdb prog # can be anything = gdb> break main = gdb> run = gdb> ^Z = % ps = % kill = = Process for prog will be left behind and can't be killed. With David's = patch process for prog dies along with gdb. Should not just the gdb be killed in the above scenario -- without the explicit killing of prog? Or does killing the tracer always imply killing the tracee? Thanks! -mi