Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:27:36 +0100 From: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> To: "Ken Smith" <kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 svn186551 Message-ID: <6101e8c40901021327g7b976032hbe3ce935fbf15a5c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1230930492.12517.15.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> References: <6101e8c40901021209g1eb6ca88wda79bd62823268bb@mail.gmail.com> <1230930492.12517.15.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks the problem description, then I revert the reverted patch in my local tree. I had a similar problem between 7.1-PRERELEASE and 7.1-RC1, it presentdes only 1 week long, under heavy load (csup / kernel compile) crashed the system, but after RC1 the system is very stable (more than 2 week uptime, and ooo3 and kde build, every day several times csup, etc etc..) On 1/2/09, Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 21:09 +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> Hi All! >> >> I have the question, why reverted the ICH10 support from 7.1? >> This is the svn commit: >> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/releng/?pathrev=186551 >> >> What is the PR number of the base of this commit or what is the >> problem description? >> >> I have a motherboard with ich10r with 3 sata2 disc (hitachi) + 1 sata >> dvd-rw (samsung), without any problem. >> >> Sorry for bad spelling or english > > Unfortunately most of the email traffic related to this was off-list. > There was one message here on list from Greg Miller saying his system > locked up and giving a date for when the problem got introduced which > was between 7.1-RC1 and 7.1-RC2 so it had been a regression that snuck > in while we were in the RC phase. It turned out the MFC that brought in > support for that chip was pulling in pieces of ATA from head that had > been intertwined with other work and it seemed likely the MFC wasn't > complete - more of the ATA pieces from head would need to be pulled in > to stabilize it. Since we were already so far behind on getting 7.1 out > we opted to back out the change rather than try to work out what else > needed to be MFCed (which would have definitely required RC3 if we tried > to do that). > > Sorry, it will just need to wait for 7.3 (though hopefully this plus the > extra stuff needed to stabilize it will work its way into 7-STABLE in > the not too distant future). > > -- > Ken Smith > - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu > there, funny things are everywhere. | > - Theodore Geisel | >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6101e8c40901021327g7b976032hbe3ce935fbf15a5c>