Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:11:26 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>
Cc:        Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: best archiver? (for music)
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903151010200.40993@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20090315080541.GB16322@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
References:  <20090313191520.GA14233@thought.org> <20090313202226.GA47453@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903132128460.33043@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090314030558.GB25027@thought.org> <20090314072602.GA75036@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090315035101.GA28705@thought.org> <20090315080541.GB16322@slackbox.xs4all.nl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> If you're not an expert you should probably stick with one of the
> --preset modes. E.g. '--preset medium' or '--preset standard'. That will
> give you variable bitrate files with good quality.

lame -h -V 3 is what i use.

> The speakers in telephones are tiny. That's probably a large part of it.
>
> The codec used to digitize voice signals for current DECT phones, G.726
> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.726] dates from 1990, so it was limited
> to the technology of that time. Modern codecs like speex probably do a
> better job!

MUCH better. record your voice at 8kHz and then try speex. it's REALLY 
excellent.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903151010200.40993>