From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 04:47:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E772616A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:47:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from salvador.pacific.net.sg (salvador.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B012F43D46 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:47:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 28129 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 04:47:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maxwell2.pacific.net.sg) (203.120.90.192) by salvador with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 04:47:11 -0000 Received: from pacific.net.sg ([210.24.202.160]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20040630044711.SAQR1183.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@pacific.net.sg>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:47:11 +0800 Message-ID: <40E245C4.6010801@pacific.net.sg> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:47:00 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040409 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20040629150632.J74139@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20040629150632.J74139@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hitachi vs Seagate: Opinions wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:47:25 -0000 Hi, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Since I can't say I've ever had a complaint (other then the U320 > firmware fiasco that Seagate did fix), I'm wondering if there is that > much of a difference with the Hitachi's to warrant the extra ~$50/drive > ... ? As you have heard from the others already, Hitachi is not a good choice. We use Fujitsu sind the mid-eighties without any problems except some early failures. Fujitsu did verz bad IDE drives but their SCSI drives are outstanding good. We also have one customer who took Seagates as Fujitsu drives were out of stock that time and he also has no problems. Erich