Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 02:10:22 +1000 From: Rob B <rbyrnes@ozemail.com.au> To: alpha@freebsd.org <alpha@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gcc error compiling KDE2 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20010929020856.01e54ec0@pop.ozemail.com.au> In-Reply-To: <15284.37752.487882.384160@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <200109281505.LAA13207@duke.cs.duke.edu> <15284.29589.489153.736235@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200109281505.LAA13207@duke.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:12 29/09/2001, Andrew Gallatin wrote: >Matthew Rezny writes: > > Thanks for the info. I have a 21164PC so its EV56 architecture and > > extentension instructions present are BWX and MVI. Does using -mev56 > > rather than -mev4 provide a performance increase or does it just help > > out the problem? > >Using bwx should also provide a performance increase. Does bwx get enabled by using -mev56 or should it be explicitly set, and if so, how? Any other compiler flag tips? Rob -- The future ain't what it used to be. This is random quote 920 of a collection of 1161 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.2.20010929020856.01e54ec0>