Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:39:09 +0000 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Shehbaz Jaffer <shehbazjaffer007@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Zoned Commands ZBC/ZAC, Shingled SMR drives, ZFS Message-ID: <CAFHbX1KLSuES8rJ1Nzho7g8kj-mD_vRAuCyYvdEK9xpz49QBZA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPLK-i9OSv4ng-6Bwqc%2Byne%2BimDx_veOkwZij=hC1jLrE_ZUJw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD2Ti2_kQhnDL9nvdCT-zMG1bPeLSqTHemn%2B9hueRDLotmsLmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPLK-i9OSv4ng-6Bwqc%2Byne%2BimDx_veOkwZij=hC1jLrE_ZUJw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Shehbaz Jaffer <shehbazjaffer007@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering what cost advantage do SMR drive provide as compared to > normal CMR drive? > > 8TB SMR drive - $ 260 > 3TB CMR (Conventional Magnetic Recording drive) - $ 105 > Purchase price is not irrelevant, but the key benefits are increased capacity per disk, and reduced power usage per disk and (multiplied by the increase in capacity) per TB. In other words, they disks consume less power, you need fewer of them, maybe allowing you to run fewer servers. Of course, you also need a mainly read only workload. The RAID rebuild test from the linked review is *scary*. I wouldn't use these in ZFS raidz without plenty of disaster recovery testing - how long does it take to re-silver the pool when you lose a disk and what is the performance characteristics of the pool whilst it is doing so. Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1KLSuES8rJ1Nzho7g8kj-mD_vRAuCyYvdEK9xpz49QBZA>