Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:59:30 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>, Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, wpaul@ctr.columbia.edu Subject: Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots) Message-ID: <20050721145930.GC77847@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050721143443.GB10010@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20050721134816.GA8550@nagual.pp.ru> <20050721142445.GA77847@stack.nl> <20050721143443.GB10010@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 06:34:43PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > I thought rl cards were inherently MP unsafe because of design > > flaws. Does anyone know it they can be used safely nowadays anyway ? >=20 > This is not something about MP exactly, but about internal logic flaws. A= s=20 > I wrote, I have _UP_ machine. That doesn't seem to matter. :-/ Could you hook up a comconsole ? I wonder whether you see the "Consider adding 'options NET_WITH_GIANT' or setting debug.mpsafenet=3D0" message before the crash. I assume you have DDB the kernel ? Marc --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC37hSezjnobFOgrERAq6LAJ0TShMfilWv3H/jFPJoyEhbNwnK6wCfQq7c lBjz3mMzk/QfzxcSw7rAWYo= =7xRn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050721145930.GC77847>