From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 7 16:37:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2BC37B401 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wopr.caltech.edu (wopr.caltech.edu [131.215.103.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7B543F93 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:37:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mph@wopr.caltech.edu) Received: from wopr.caltech.edu (localhost.caltech.edu [127.0.0.1]) by wopr.caltech.edu (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h67NbQb9074292; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:37:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mph@wopr.caltech.edu) Received: (from mph@localhost) by wopr.caltech.edu (8.12.9/8.12.3/Submit) id h67NbQ1S074291; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:37:26 -0700 From: Matthew Hunt To: Andrew Thomson Message-ID: <20030707233726.GA74181@wopr.caltech.edu> References: <1057619317.52026.28.camel@athomson.prv.au.itouchnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1057619317.52026.28.camel@athomson.prv.au.itouchnet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spamassassin slow to process messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 23:37:28 -0000 On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:08:37AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote: > I've got a CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (930.32-MHz > 686-class CPU) and I'm seeing performance like, > > Jul 8 08:25:11 athomson spamd[52016]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for > ajt:1001 in 10.2 seconds, 2132 bytes. Well, that's pretty bad. I see: Jul 7 04:05:49 wopr spamd[66708]: identified spam (8.4/5.0) for mph:501 in 4.0 seconds, 1206 bytes. Jul 7 04:08:18 wopr spamd[66726]: clean message (-5.3/5.0) for mph:501 in 7.1 seconds, 2553 bytes. This is on a Cyrix 6x86 (166 MHz 486-class CPU) with no L2 cache. :-) Is the machine heavily loaded with other work? Assuming that there are no messages between the ones you posted, it doesn't look like the machine is overburdened by mail alone. -- Matthew Hunt * Science rules. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ *