From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Sep 5 3:50: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F80A37B409 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 03:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f85Ao7o90980; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 03:50:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 03:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200109051050.f85Ao7o90980@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: ports/30314: [PATCH] Add Exim packages to CDROM 1 Reply-To: Peter Pentchev Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/30314; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/30314: [PATCH] Add Exim packages to CDROM 1 Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:23:04 +0300 On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 02:20:01AM -0700, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Sep 2001 03:06:34 +0900, "Akinori MUSHA" wrote: > > > I suppose they should be added prior to (or along with) exim then. > > I agree. I think the major MTAs should be on the first CD, along with > Apache (and probably apache-ssl too). There's a little problem with that: we do not package qmail because of the weird DJB license or maybe the lack thereof. G'luck, Peter -- This sentence was in the past tense. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message