Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 22:42:03 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which OS for notebook Message-ID: <20101006044203.GA72396@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <4CABD3B9.2070305@gmail.com> References: <20101005221230.GA87356@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20101005215125.GB71713@guilt.hydra> <4CABD3B9.2070305@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:41:13PM -0300, Gonzalo Nemmi wrote: >=20 > In my personal experience I have found that creating, maintaining and=20 > handling rpm packages is a lot easier than creating ports or keeping the= =20 > software up to date using packages. I find working with the ports system easier, as an end user, than DEB- and RPM-based systems that I've used. I have never built DEB- or RPM-based packages, and the one time I tried creating a port I failed (though frankly I didn't try that hard -- it was just an experiment when I was bored one evening), so I guess I'll have to take your word for it when it comes to creating ports. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyr/hsACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUOiQCePTL5cxWxv0U2KTr3hsx57pIA OlAAnRQ0a4F4ei7b/AwbnlwUYQNHavQl =fLPB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101006044203.GA72396>