Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 08:25:56 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Subject: Re: UPDATING entry for X.org changes Message-ID: <19428.1748.805406.173416@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <j2ne890cae61005070520qf68713d7v4354384415d1fa9e@mail.gmail.com> References: <19428.941.605850.331539@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <j2ne890cae61005070520qf68713d7v4354384415d1fa9e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=3DE9_Ladan?=3D writes: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Is there one? =A0I've been checking daily, and ... = nothing. > > (Various sited, including just now "cvsup.freebsd.org:.) > > No, there is indeed none for now. =09Obvious question: why not? Even if all it says is "use 'portmaster -af' or portupgrade equivalent", isn't having such a huge event go unremarked in front-line documentation a Bad Idea(tm)? =09=09=09=09=09Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19428.1748.805406.173416>