From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 7 12:26:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCDD1065670; Fri, 7 May 2010 12:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD37B8FC0C; Fri, 7 May 2010 12:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 May 2010 08:25:59 -0400 Received: from mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.54]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.8-GA) with ESMTP id LPJ58157; Fri, 7 May 2010 08:25:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 May 2010 08:25:57 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <19428.1748.805406.173416@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 08:25:56 -0400 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= In-Reply-To: References: <19428.941.605850.331539@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Robert Huff Subject: Re: UPDATING entry for X.org changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 12:26:00 -0000 =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=3DE9_Ladan?=3D writes: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Is there one? =A0I've been checking daily, and ... = nothing. > > (Various sited, including just now "cvsup.freebsd.org:.) > > No, there is indeed none for now. =09Obvious question: why not? Even if all it says is "use 'portmaster -af' or portupgrade equivalent", isn't having such a huge event go unremarked in front-line documentation a Bad Idea(tm)? =09=09=09=09=09Robert Huff