From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 29 20:38:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF9B16A40E; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.176.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8A413C478; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l0TKc5Jf098640 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:38:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id l0TKc5J9098639; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:38:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:38:05 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20070129203805.GA98405@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20070120170723.34c223fb@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20070122164926.GA8146@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <24984594@bsam.ru> <20070129091006.GA19174@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <91054724@bsam.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <91054724@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 147.229.176.14 Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT/HEADS-UP: linux 2.6.16 emulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:38:07 -0000 > So far I have this one: > ----- > Jan 29 17:49:18 bsam kernel: linux: pid 892 (pwd): syscall openat not implemented hm... sounds like I already have this implemented in p4. can you please check if my implementation in p4 is ok? the LTP test is obviously broken. thnx > > > 2. Works but coredumps when exitting: > > > - net/skype > > > cant reproduce that. I have proceses left when I "click on exit in skype" but I guess > > its normal as skype wants to be able to answer a phone call. > > There is no coredump with linux_base-fc4_9 -- I got it with > linux_base-fc6. hm... where can I get this stuff? :) and btw.. I am getting a coredump of the operaplugin* thing. > > > Sometimes (not stable result) I get the following LOR. This one I got > > > while testing net/skype: > [LOR deletted] > > I'll investigate that. thnx > > Just one LOR more (but the same bug?): > ----- > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: lock order reversal: > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: 1st 0xc0bd58a0 emuldata->shared lock (emuldata->shared lock) @ /usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../compat/linux/linux_emul.c:117 > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: 2nd 0xc0bd58e0 emuldata lock (emuldata lock) @ /usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../compat/linux/linux_emul.c:67 > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: KDB: stack backtrace: > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: db_trace_self_wrapper(c09442e5) at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x25 > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: kdb_backtrace(0,ffffffff,c0a525d0,c0a525f8,c09ed16c,...) at kdb_backtrace+0x29 > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: witness_checkorder(c0bd58e0,9,c0bd2066,43) at witness_checkorder+0x586 > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: _sx_xlock(c0bd58e0,c0bd2066,43,c4597240,312,...) at _sx_xlock+0x50 > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: em_find(c472c900,1,c0bd58a0,c0bd2066,75,...) at em_find+0x51 > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: linux_proc_init(c45e8510,312,3d0f00,0,16,...) at linux_proc_init+0xbd > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: linux_clone(c45e8510,e6946d00) at linux_clone+0x8b > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: syscall(e6946d38) at syscall+0x256 > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x20 > Jan 29 17:38:53 bsam kernel: --- syscall (758682804), eip = 0x2, esp = 0xe6946d74, ebp = 0xbfbfd304 --- hm.. lemme work on this :) (I'll post you a patch in a few minutes) thnx!