From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 29 03:19:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA16993 for current-outgoing; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 03:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sovcom.kiae.su (sovcom.kiae.su [193.125.152.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA16849; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 03:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sovcom.kiae.su id AA29250 (5.65.kiae-1 ); Sun, 29 Sep 1996 13:05:31 +0300 Received: by sovcom.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Sun, 29 Sep 96 13:05:31 +0300 Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.ru (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA00787; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 13:05:49 +0300 (MSK) Message-Id: <199609291005.NAA00787@nagual.ru> Subject: Re: Warning: dangerous SCSI option: AHC_SCBPAGING_ENABLE In-Reply-To: <199609290828.BAA08892@freefall.freebsd.org> from "Justin T. Gibbs" at "Sep 29, 96 01:28:15 am" To: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org (Justin T. Gibbs) Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 13:05:48 +0300 (MSK) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, scsi@FreeBSD.org From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (Andrey A. Chernov) Organization: self X-Class: Fast X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL26 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Its been stated several times on -current that SCBPAGING is a > bad idea right now. This is old news. It looks strange for me, because it work very well with one drive... Could you please add some warning (maybe in LINT?) about very experimental nature of this option? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/