Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:43 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marius_N=FCnnerich?= <marius@nuenneri.ch> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Subject: Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ? Message-ID: <b649e5e0911200530v1485c57cq7a6e88a2cbaa6311@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200911202357.48622.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <E1N2NcA-0004c4-CE@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <200911202302.24794.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <b649e5e0911200436o469af95bvc2691257fbb1ddcb@mail.gmail.com> <200911202357.48622.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 14:27, Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> wrot= e: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Marius N=FCnnerich wrote: >> > Actually that is an interesting point, the swap partitions don't >> > have an entry in /dev/gptid, although perhaps that is because >> > glabel has grabbed that node. >> >> If I remember correctly nodes vanish when another name for the same >> device is opened. Maybe this happens for the other gpt labels too? > > Hmm, but I have gptid ones corresponding to my ZFS partitions.. It seems > like a bug. Maybe. Could you paste kern.geom.confdot, kern.geom.confxml and mount output to pastie.org or the like.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b649e5e0911200530v1485c57cq7a6e88a2cbaa6311>