From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 10:31:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4261016A420; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:31:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A4513C4D1; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541BB9021D; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 05:31:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:31:15 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: QJ6ODXVKX1zDs6darzoHol257op8BaLzd1tpbCQ6mP8q 1202380275 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930FF15196; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 05:31:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47AADDF1.4020507@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:31:13 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070928) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Silbersack References: <200802061540.m16FeXGD030782@repoman.freebsd.org> <47AA5925.3000008@FreeBSD.org> <20080206204812.J41033@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20080206204812.J41033@odysseus.silby.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Mike Silbersack , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_id.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:31:16 -0000 Mike Silbersack wrote: > > Does MANET multicast require: > > 1) Sequentiality. > or > 2) No repetition of an ID within a certain timeframe. > > The distinction is quite important! No, it completely hijacks the field for its own purposes and encodes its own information in there.