Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:05:30 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20 is being merged
Message-ID:  <20071026230530.GA57346@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1193419761.21743.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
References:  <1193261223.93212.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <op.t0rsgwav9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20071026155223.GB7312@FreeBSD.org> <1193419761.21743.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:29:21PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v p? 26. 10. 2007 v 15:52 +0000:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:27:58PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > > Before anyone ask about why not test in pointyhat first. We did, but  
> > > pointyhat has stability problems so it has missed some ports. We had to go  
> > > ahead put in FreeBSD ports tree and we will be working on from there and  
> > > we also will be keeping our eyes on pointyhat logs.
> > 
> > I'm worried about PF date coming too soon.  Maybe we should extend it
> > (say, for a week) so Gnome-related problems can get fixed before the
> > deadline?
> 
> And what is the freeze designed for other than fixing port problems?

I believe I've seen PF date extended in the past for exactly the same
reason.  If I'm mistaken, please accept my apologies, and let's move on!

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071026230530.GA57346>