From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Sep 16 23:55:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA23521
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 23:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from konig.elte.hu (konig.elte.hu [157.181.6.22])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA23467
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 23:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (sebesty@localhost) by konig.elte.hu (8.8.3/8.7.3/7s) with SMTP id IAA05421 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 08:51:05 +0200
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 08:51:04 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Zoltan Sebestyen <sebesty@cs.elte.hu>
X-Sender: sebesty@konig
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: getopt_long
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.93.970917084827.5163B-100000@konig>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

 I'm porting an application from Linux which uses getopt_long(), which is
an extension of getopt and is able to handle 'long' options, like
'-checkrules'. I'd like to know if there's a replacement for this
function.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sebestyen Zoltan			It all seems so stupid,
					it makes me want to give up.
szoli@caesar.elte.hu			But why should I give up,
					when it all seems so stupid?