Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:49:55 +0200
From:      Wolfgang Riegler <wolfgang@riegler.homeip.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: gateway_enable
Message-ID:  <201009171049.55372.wolfgang@riegler.homeip.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C911EC0.9000607@beatsnet.com>
References:  <201009152110.36850.wolfgang.riegler@gmx.de> <4C911EC0.9000607@beatsnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you for your support. You're right, our administrator has to add a route back to the new gateway.



Am Mittwoch, 15. September 2010, 21:30:08 schrieb Beat Siegenthaler:
> 
>  On 15.09.10 21:10, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
> 
> > >  I thought gateway_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf should be sufficient. But it doesn't work. Do I need something else?
> > >
> > >
> Looks all ok.
> But does 192.168.40.1 have a route to 192.168.50.0/24 via GW
> 192.168.40.122?
> 
> > > Internet:
> > > Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire
> > > default            192.168.40.1       UGS         0        0    rl0
> > > 127.0.0.1          link#6             UH          0        0    lo0
> > > 192.168.40.0/24    link#2             U           1      274    rl0
> > > 192.168.40.122     link#2             UHS         0        0    lo0
> > > 192.168.50.0/24    link#1             U           0       15    re0
> > > 192.168.50.1       link#1             UHS         0        0    lo0
> > >
> Gruss Beat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201009171049.55372.wolfgang>