Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:33:59 -0500 (EST) From: Darren Henderson <darren@nighttide.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>, <bright@wintelcom.net>, <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>, <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: NO MORE '-BETA' Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0103162032020.10700-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20010315215349.A70879@mollari.cthul.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> There have been several people on -questions and -stable confused and
> worried about why they got a beta release instead of a stable snapshot
> like they "asked for". I think we could stand to find a better name,
> perhaps 4.3-PRERELEASE.
If the lack of the stable is what is confusing them then perhaps it should
stay. Is there a limit on the length of the tag? Something like
4.2-STABLE(4.3-TRANSITION) would be clearer if overly verbose.
______________________________________________________________________
Darren Henderson darren@nighttide.net
Help fight junk e-mail, visit http://www.cauce.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.30.0103162032020.10700-100000>