Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:11:33 +0100 From: "Attilio Rao" <attilio@freebsd.org> To: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mark Atkinson <atkin901@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: em0 panic: mutex em0 not owned Message-ID: <3bbf2fe10711271111w5bc7f2b1ta4264cb14b6f1626@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0711270925w55742526n7ef77b1fcef3016f@mail.gmail.com> References: <4744EBA4.7020209@clearchain.com> <3bbf2fe10711220408t30136430s15fdba0ebcbbfa66@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe10711220427s38561159k4879d0c792d09694@mail.gmail.com> <474B4876.9020209@clearchain.com> <3bbf2fe10711261431s1b1bd697n46d370900d5fe9c0@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0711261434u817eb06xe05eba8447afc3ae@mail.gmail.com> <fihfhp$7ts$1@ger.gmane.org> <2a41acea0711270925w55742526n7ef77b1fcef3016f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2007/11/27, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>: > On Nov 27, 2007 8:10 AM, Mark Atkinson <atkin901@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Is this expected after the fix? > > > > acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "network driver" > > 1st em0 @ /usr/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c:1018 > > 2nd em0 @ /usr/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c:1252 > > Same type, different lock, I don't see a problem unless > there's some subtle thing I'm not aware of? do you use the same name in mutex initialization? Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe10711271111w5bc7f2b1ta4264cb14b6f1626>