Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:20:27 +0200
From:      Goran Lowkrantz <goran.lowkrantz@ismobile.com>
To:        "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>, kib@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Request for testing: ata(4) MFC
Message-ID:  <836B8A264C59B67CC07EB80D@syn>
In-Reply-To: <48F70642.7080701@yandex.ru>
References:  <676151223134689@webmail38.yandex.ru> <20081005004808.GA70137@icarus.home.lan>	<48E99C18.6070602@yandex.ru> <20081006051211.GA10542@icarus.home.lan> <20081010115855.GA31707@icarus.home.lan> <20081016071700.GA2793@icarus.home.lan> <48F70642.7080701@yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========5B9268ADA166068F5DD8==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Ok, I was not sure if this was a "No news is good news" request.

Attached are the lspci:s of the MB and devices I have had the pleasure of=20
testing. I have found nothing bad on these once but please remember that I=20
had to hack the nVidia MCP67-A1 to have it accepted as a SATA and AHCI=20
controller.

All controllers have had large copy in/out, backups at file-system level=20
via dump/zfs snapshot and tar and all have had bonny++ tests done.

On AHCI controllers, I have at least remove and re-inserted one disk of a=20
zpool.

Cheers,
	G=F6ran

Best regards,
	G=F6ran L

--On October 16, 2008 13:15:46 +0400 "Andrey V. Elsukov"=20
<bu7cher@yandex.ru> wrote:

> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> - Could someone provide an explanation of the 48-bit LBA addressing
>>   changes (see lines 988-1003 in the patch)?  I'd like to know what they
>>   do, and if further QA/testing is needed with this.
>
> I think this is for debug purposes.
>
>> - Can we please see about adding the FreeNAS project's ata timeout
>>   sysctls?  I see lots of delays/sleeps in numerous pieces of code that
>>   pertain to soft or hard resets of AHCI controllers, and I often worry
>>   about the implications of hard-coded timeouts.
>>
>>   http://freenas.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/freenas/trunk/build/kernel-p
>>   atches/ata/files/patch-ata.diff?view=3Dmarkup
>
> As i remember changes in FreeNAS don't change timeouts for resets.
> In any case, these changes can not be in 7.1-RELEASE. My patch
> targeted to move changes from CURRENT to 7.1. But it seems there
> are too few testers and patch can not be commited.
>
> --
> WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



................................................... the future isMobile

  Goran Lowkrantz <goran.lowkrantz@ismobile.com>
  System Architect, isMobile AB
  Sandviksgatan 81, PO Box 58, S-971 03 Lule=E5, Sweden
  Mobile: +46(0)70-587 87 82
http://www.ismobile.com ...............................................
--==========5B9268ADA166068F5DD8==========--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?836B8A264C59B67CC07EB80D>