Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 22:53:57 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl> To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> Cc: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>, "freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org" <freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is this list active? Message-ID: <20000822225357.C616@freebie.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <20000822205820.K14958@daemon.ninth-circle.org>; from jruigrok@via-net-works.nl on Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:58:21PM %2B0200 References: <20000818104056.A84928@lucifer.bart.nl> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0008180823480.22846-100000@mini.acl.lanl.gov> <20000822205820.K14958@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:58:21PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > -On [20000818 18:01], Ronald G Minnich (rminnich@lanl.gov) wrote: > >On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > > > >> Just a curious question, I guess a keep alive type of system where a > >> daemon per host sends out and acks keep alive messages is the easiest > >> form of high availability, right? > > > >not so clear that it is useful, but it will work. > > We need to start somewhere. ;) Right! > And a keep-alive type of signaller daemon is the easiest to program and > thus a good starting point. At least for me. I plan on building myself a Tru64 Trucluster in one of the coming weeks. This should give me a better feeling what a cluster can do. A complicated one in this case, but also a feature rich one. W/ -- Wilko Bulte wilko@freebsd.org Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000822225357.C616>