Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:38:09 -0700 From: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol Message-ID: <20021023153809.GA7503@HAL9000.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20021022172912.B22851@espresso.q9media.com> References: <20021020025400.GA13776@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021022082241.GG3325@sunbay.com> <20021022184605.GA85779@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021022172912.B22851@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>: > No one has started work on any of the C99 math functions yet. I > think with the exception of the math functions we conform to C99. Actually, I hacked up some patches for fpclassify(), is*(), and friends some time ago. But nobody was interested in compliance at the time except for a couple of port maintainers, so I didn't bother finishing it up. In any case, I no longer have the time. (It's fairly easy, given that some of the code is already there, but a bit more work to optimize for every architecture FreeBSD supports.) Note that while you're adding the C99 math stuff, you might want to fix up float.h, which is just wrong about long doubles (see PR i386/38288). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021023153809.GA7503>