From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 16:39:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E307F16A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:39:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9091643D46 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:39:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so367351rnk for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:39:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=qrYD1B1MTZ622QsXHDrE37p3+5IEZSncZEkoaDuwFc/V3UvpX+J0mO429DEKKmqHMuV18SZ/Q8CDnzmybSOrk0RJGGhvN58M2dzkva54752qSxSVSNwQECUbCedJdngga1D7bQOCyVm9N+Lq6G0RvinE0NzTeS4H/lU57tA/lc8= Received: by 10.38.66.24 with SMTP id o24mr1173378rna; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.14.69 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57d7100004102509396fb77579@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:39:18 -0700 From: pete wright To: "tm4525@aol.com" In-Reply-To: <96.186ca920.2eae82f1@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <96.186ca920.2eae82f1@aol.com> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious investigations into UNIX and Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pete wright List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:39:22 -0000 On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:25:21 EDT, tm4525@aol.com wrote: > > > > > In a message dated 10/25/04 11:48:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > nomadlogic@gmail.com writes: > > There's also less documentation, fewer resources, etc. So its more > difficult > > to be proficient in unix than in windows. > > > >what are you talking about "less documentation" for Unix?!? What > >"Unix" are you referring to...Solaris...HPUX..AIX...BSD? I'm sorry to > >bite on this flame bait but i've been tracking your posts for some > >time now and I really don't understand where you get these ideas from? > Let's see. The mailing list is "freebsd-questions". Hmmm. I wonder. > > Perhaps the word "logic" in your domain name needs tweaking? > > OK aside from personal attacks, I'm still confused as to where you derived the fact that "Unix" (which I suppose you do not mean as the generic term for a type of multiuser operating system, but infact BSD which is not technically UNIX) has less documentation than Windows. I can't remember the last time I typed: > man net on anything like that on a win box. Now I would grant that Microsoft *does* have the MSCE mill....now I'm not sure if that would equate them documenting thier products.... -p >