Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 19:29:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Jay Nelson <jdn@acp.qiv.com> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>, Nicole <freelist@webweaver.net>, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD advocacy list <FreeBSD-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: InfoWorld Electric: Linux Zealots Trashing FreeBSD, Berkeley Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980503191046.1375A-100000@acp.qiv.com> In-Reply-To: <19980504083310.B356@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Greg Lehey wrote: [snip] >Right. When did you last see this mentioned *anywhere* in System V.4? >You can bet your bottom dollar that Microsoft wouldn't be any better. There is nothing with which to compare Microsoft. They have established a low point yet matched. The BSD license is scattered all through AIX -- although a strong argument could be made that it's not really SYSV. I think it's a very BSD-like OS with some unusual integrated applications. Their SPs wouldn't function without free software -- kerberos, automounter, perl and tcl. I think they've been good about it. They even include source with the SP software. -- Jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980503191046.1375A-100000>