From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 22 7:50: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D49537B401; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 07:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610D343E4A; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from nbs.imp.ch (nbs.imp.ch [157.161.4.7]) by mail.imp.ch (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8MEnxHb042988; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:49:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Martin.Blapp@imp.ch) Received: from nbs.imp.ch (nbs.imp.ch [157.161.4.7]) by nbs.imp.ch (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8MEnx75904785; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:49:59 +0200 (MES) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:49:59 +0200 From: Martin Blapp To: Stephen McKay Cc: Martin Blapp , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c In-Reply-To: <200209221409.g8ME9DB16763@dungeon.home> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, > ... I thought I should explicitly mention that merging this particular > change as it stands is a bad idea because PNIC and Davicom cards (at least) > are not yet correctly handled. The code in -stable is the old broken but > apparently harmless code. This new code is attempting to be more correct > but breaks support for some cards. Odd situation, no? What chips do have these card ? We can just do this check for the admtek cards, can we ? Have we now different cards with the same chips but different behaviour ??? I know that a 981 983 983b 985 admtek chip exist. Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message