From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 24 10:26:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCC1106564A for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF928FC15 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1OAPq3X014619; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:25:56 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:25:34 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <4F46847D.4010908@my.gd> <201202241346.15160.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202241725.35198.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Peter Maloney , Andreas Nilsson Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 and the sheer number of problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:26:02 -0000 Hi, On Friday 24 February 2012 15:34:06 Andreas Nilsson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Erich Dollansky < > erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> wrote: > > > On Friday 24 February 2012 04:21:12 Peter Maloney wrote: > > > Am 23.02.2012 21:15, schrieb Mark Felder: > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:25:01 -0600, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > Let me suggest this. > > > > Currently, we have on the disk normally two kernels. The current one and > > the last one. Why not add a third one called testing? > > > > Add then an entry into the boot menu that users can switch between the > > current kernel and a kernel they just installed for testing. > > > > Well, as you would want to test both kernel + userland its get a bit tricky > on ufs based system, as you have to setup several slices/partitions. For > ZFS its easier, as the only thing required would be a snapshot of clean > install, which the user then can just zfs recv, modify vfs.root.mountfrom > and so on. > /usr/local for the current system and /usr/localtest for the other system. Of course, the same for /bin, /etc ... It is not that difficult. Or a script which renames the directories for the next start. Erich