Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:27:15 +0200
From:      "O. Hartmann" <>
Subject:   Re: Inter-VLAN routing on CURRENT: any known issues?
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <20170716211441.GA63054@krenn.local>
References:  <> <> <> <> <> <20170716211441.GA63054@krenn.local>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:14:41 +0200
Frank Steinborn <> schrieb:

> O. Hartmann <> wrote:
> > I have not have any success on this and I must ask now, to not make a f=
ool out of my
> > self, whether the concept of having several vlan over one single NIC is=
 possible with
> > FreeBSD (12-CURRENT, as of today, r321055.
> >=20
> > Since it is even not possible to "route" from a non-tagged igb1 to a ta=
gged vlan
> > igb1.2 or igb1.66 (for instance) on the same NIC, I have a faint suspec=
t that I'm
> > doing something terribly wrong.
> >=20
> > I think everyone working with vlan should have those problems, but sinc=
e I can not
> > find anything on the list, I must do something wrong - my simple conclu=
> >=20
> > What is it? =20
> Do you have enabled net.inet.ip.forwarding?

... aber selbstverst=C3=A4ndlich doch, das ist das erste seit nunmehr 20 Ja=
hren FreeBSD, was
auf einem Router eingestellt wird ...

Wie ich bereits beschrieben habe: pingen (ICMP) auf andere VLANs geht, nur =
keine IP
Dienste - und das mit oder ohne eingeschalteter IPFW.



O. Hartmann

Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr
Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Abs.=
 4 BDSG).

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>