Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 16:53:10 -0700 From: Scott Blachowicz <Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org> To: Tim Vanderhoek <ac199@hwcn.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/7617: update mail/nmh port to nmh-0.27 Message-ID: <199808152353.QAA09318@two.sabami.seaslug.org> In-Reply-To: <199808152030.NAA18821@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <199808152030.NAA18821@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > if sendfiles(1) is a new man page that comes with the update then this > > change should be reflected in the Makefile, and the PLIST should have the > > gzip'd version. > > No, it shouldn't be listed at all in the PLIST, presuming you are > correctly using the MAN? variables. Is correct use documented in the handbook or in bsd.port.mk? > ... > Again, presuming the MAN? variables are correctly used for all of > those manpages, none of them should be listed in the PLIST. > > [You need, of course, the latest bsd.port.mk] Is the latest in the 2.2.7 release that I just received? I've been lax in updating my BSD system at home (it's still at 2.2.2) and had been meaning to update to 2.2.6 when I heard that 2.2.7 was on its way... Hmmm...I've been CVSUP'ing the ports collection - I don't see bsd.port.mk in there. Would it make any sense to have a special directory in there for control/maintenance files (e.g. bsd.port.mk), so it would get picked up by CVSUP'ing the ports? Or should I add a little magic incantation to my /etc/cvsupfile to snag the needed files (I don't need/want all of the src dist). Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808152353.QAA09318>