Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:17:24 -0700
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org, cokane@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
Message-ID:  <44008314.8030205@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060225140509.GC79616@comp.chem.msu.su>
References:  <20060225140509.GC79616@comp.chem.msu.su>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> In the course of reviewing and cleaning up the default configuration
> of kernel options, it was suggested by the Release Engineers that
> we had a separate module for TDFX_LINUX instead of placing the
> burden on the device tdfx and module 3dfx.  Could anybody interested
> test this change?  I've made sure it builds, but I have no 3dfx hw
> to really test it.  The testing is as simple as building the new
> 3dfx and 3dfx_linux modules, loading them, and verifying that the
> linux apps work with the device as before.  Thanks in advance!
> 

Why keep the TDFX_LINUX option defined in sys/conf/options?

Scott




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44008314.8030205>