From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 12:26:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2C016A565; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDE24414F; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:06:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5LC6JCR048828; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:06:19 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:06:19 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Ganbold In-Reply-To: <4498F492.2060003@micom.mng.net> Message-ID: <20060621145530.U41119@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <449015DE.6090407@fer.hr> <20060616211540.D37640@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <200606201002.07695.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060620181916.732dbc5c@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <4498A387.3070604@micom.mng.net> <20060621095311.A60237@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <4498F492.2060003@micom.mng.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Adi Pircalabu , Hajimu UMEMOTO , Ivan Voras , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Marcus Alves Grando Subject: Re: Linux-flashplugin7 & rtld - RFC X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:26:38 -0000 Hello! On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Ganbold wrote: >> You mean __weak_reference patch to rtld, yes? > > I tried to follow http://www.jail.se/freebsd.html with > http://www.jail.se/freebsd/rtld_dlsym_hack.diff patch. This patch is essentially does the same thing as __weak_reference one. >> Do you see "Shockwave Flash 7.*" plugin installed when selecting "Help -> >> About Plug-ins" in your browser? > > I see Shockwave Flash 7.0 r63 enabled in about:plugins. Strange. I've just build native firefox-1.5.0.4,1 from ports, and I can't even find info about plugins (menu Help contains only "About Mozilla Firefox", no "About Plug-ins" there). >> hanging the browser). So just remove linux-flashplugin-* port, and you'll >> get the original behaviour (no hangs, no flash either). > > Most probably it will work by removing linux-flashplugin*, but I would like > to use flash plugin. > Probably there is some other issue and it is not related to the patch. I was curious whether patching rtld _itself_ (w/o using linux-flashplugin7) hurts your application (i.e. causes a regression). I see that it isn't the case. I'm aware that linux-flashplugin7 itself is _not_ stable under FreeBSD + native browser + linuxpluginwrapper. Patch just makes it possible to use this combination _if it works for you_ (for many Flash-using sites it actually works, just not for all). >> installed, this is completely new problem. I'll try to install >> native Firefox from ports this evening and then check whether rtld >> patch itself (w/o linux-flashplugin) changes anything. > Please let me know how it works. As I expected, w/o linux-flashplugin rtld patch doesn't affect operation of the native firefox: no hangs on www.fifaworldcup.com, no Flash either. In other words, no regression. Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE