Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:41:18 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Michael David Crawford <mdc@prgmr.com> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finishing up the xen port - would funding help? Message-ID: <d763ac660908290541n241e4aa5t8b4fd55ceba0db98@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A991ECD.6000306@prgmr.com> References: <77abe410908211256g44dd20d8o9b50c20357e63a6b@mail.gmail.com> <d763ac660908281618u50d9ebf7i45f41fdb7f42924e@mail.gmail.com> <4A98DFF6.4060404@prgmr.com> <4A990C96.6090706@prgmr.com> <d763ac660908290417s7b21e0d5s44b0842c8d14563@mail.gmail.com> <4A991ECD.6000306@prgmr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The -head xen stuff I was testing worked fine with the out-of-box Xen hypervisor shipped with CentOS 5.3. That is what I'm using to do development against at the moment. Adrian 2009/8/29 Michael David Crawford <mdc@prgmr.com>: > Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >> Just don't dick around with that stuff unless you're an actual developer= ! >> :) >> >> stick to a distribution you get support from. I'd suggest CentOS. > > I'm concerned that the FreeBSD support might need patches made to the Xen > kernel or to the various Dom0s. > > If that were the case, we really would be wanting to run the development > code. > > When I was working with Xen a few months ago, the development code had al= l > kinds of stuff in it that wasn't available in any of the releases. > > Mike > -- > Michael David Crawford > mdc@prgmr.com > > =A0 prgmr.com - We Don't Assume You Are Stupid. > > =A0 =A0 =A0Xen-Powered Virtual Private Servers: http://prgmr.com/xen > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d763ac660908290541n241e4aa5t8b4fd55ceba0db98>