Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 07:11:05 +0100 From: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> To: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Dependencies_=e2=80=93_drm-kmod=2c_drm-stable-kmod_?= =?UTF-8?Q?and_drm-next-kmod?= Message-ID: <84ea1230-d6c5-cc0a-a179-8da545790939@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <eb55b68a-d728-3633-ee80-6e8b88054dd0@freebsd.org> References: <b7e0571c-c233-e4d6-7a2e-86adc49b4600@gmail.com> <eb55b68a-d728-3633-ee80-6e8b88054dd0@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/10/2018 14:03, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> … >> $ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-next-kmod >> drm-kmod >> drm-kmod >> $ >> >> – is there _truly_ intended to be some dependency between drm-next-kmod and drm-kmod? > > Hi! > > The version of drm-*-kmod that's pulled in is dependent on your FreeBSD version. … OK, I wasn't aware of that. For me at this time: - post-installation of drm-next-kmod, the presence of drm-kmod is pretty much a show-stopper – better to be without drm-kmod, leaving drm-next-kmod in isolation. I'd like to await Pete Wright's response to <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-October/071517.html>; before sharing details. Thanks Graham
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?84ea1230-d6c5-cc0a-a179-8da545790939>