From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 6 11:43:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from elbas.partitur.se (elbas.partitur.se [193.219.246.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86D337B5E8 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 11:43:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from partitur.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elbas.partitur.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA24854; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 20:43:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Message-ID: <393D4650.6FDA2CE7@partitur.se> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 20:43:28 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: sv, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: linux emul: is nfs mounted dev directory a bad thing? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! Is accessing the /compat/linux/dev directory (along with the rest of /compat/linux) over nfs A Bad Thing(tm) in terms of performance? My guess is the nodes made by mknod are just references to hardware stuff, and then it doesn't matter much if they're nfs mounted. My knowledge in the area of device nodes is limited, though... Any suggestions, pro or against? Does it matter? Thanks Palle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message