Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:39:01 +0100 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> To: Helge Oldach <helge.oldach@atosorigin.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: sendmail 8.12.2 MFC'ed Message-ID: <20020327093901.B35734@mail.webmonster.de> In-Reply-To: <200203270815.JAA29124@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com>; from helge.oldach@atosorigin.com on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:15:42AM %2B0100 References: <20020327075705.A34517@mail.webmonster.de> <200203270815.JAA29124@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Helge Oldach(helge.oldach@atosorigin.com)@2002.03.27 09:15:42 +0000: > Karsten W. Rohrbach: > >Helge Oldach(helge.oldach@atosorigin.com)@2002.03.26 23:26:57 +0000: > >[...] > >> standard, well- and widely-known piece of software around. You may not > >> like it but both S******* and B*** are the de facto standards. Period. >=20 > Please quote correctly and don't falsify my words here. I am not willing > to discuss with you showing this unacceptable attitude. as i pointed out in my previous mail, this is _not_ a software[A] vs.=20 software[B] discussion, and your way of approaching the questions i=20 posed does not bring you, me, the community or anyone any further. i blanked out two "buzzwords", and that on purpose. this was not meant to falsify, and i admit that i should have marked this removal of non-relevant co-information. i think i made my point clear by now, so that everybody interested understands what i mean. in case of not understanding my words, everyone is free to _ask_. bashing on people without reason does not make any sense and i find your way to approach a discussion to be not very fruitful or constructive. that said i ask you if you also think of that as an "unacceptable attitude"? on the other hand, quoting you as "[...]not willing to discuss[...]", your behaviour ultimately proves that obviously this is the case, yes. if you are not able to discuss this on a technical level, or perhaps you are not in the mood to do so, please, consider not commenting on=20 the whole thing here. if you want to tell me your personal feelings about my person, please do so via private mail. you are always welcome to do that. my native language is german (i guess your's, too) so this might work out a little more productive than the stuff you posted here. thank you. have a nice day, /k --=20 > Hackers do it with fewer instructions. KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n= et/ GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 B= F46 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1= 0x --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8oYUlM0BPTilkv0YRApRbAKCgyT9NBKOnYzbMRlYjB9430zsuFACfZrkR KhsBxxme5hZRjIvmwT753M8= =0CTF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020327093901.B35734>