From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 10:11:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8DD16A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:11:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5C043D1D; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:11:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OIBinS006319; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:11:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2OIBiSi006318; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:11:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:11:44 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20040324181144.GA6200@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200403231608.i2NG8XmM046696@repoman.freebsd.org> <40608C18.60103@dougbarton.net> <20040324165038.GB3323@dragon.nuxi.com> <1080147439.51026.15.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1080147439.51026.15.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Clement Laforet cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist ports/devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:11:45 -0000 On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 05:57:20PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > PORTREVISION should be raised when there's a change (even minor) in the > package. Axing a file from plist is a good reason for PORTREVISION > raise. NO, it's not. Unless that removed file cause the binary to act differently. There is nothing wrong with having a useless file on my disk, that will get rm'ed when then port is upgraded. This is exactly the PORTREVISION churn that shouldn't be happening. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)