From owner-cvs-all Wed Aug 2 10:55:52 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725AE37BFF2; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:55:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA65028; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 11:55:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA92899; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 11:55:09 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200008021755.LAA92899@harmony.village.org> To: mjacob@feral.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dcreg.h Cc: Sheldon Hearn , Bill Paul , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 02 Aug 2000 10:52:49 PDT." References: Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 11:55:08 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Matthew Jacob writes: : Not quite. BitKeeper has a notion of 'change sets' which allow you to group : sets of commits, per-branch, per-bug (e.g.). Yes, but you still have to construct them properly. perforce has the ability to group sets of commits as well that you are working on in your tree, iirc. But it is still possible to do stupid things... :-( Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message