Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:41:43 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Stefan Farfeleder <e0026813@stud3.tuwien.ac.at>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol Message-ID: <20021022204143.GA18064@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <3DB5B508.25EC9C14@mindspring.com> References: <20021020025400.GA13776@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021022082241.GG3325@sunbay.com> <20021022184605.GA85779@xor.obsecurity.org> <3DB5A9B6.1C2D1684@mindspring.com> <20021022200827.GA252@frog.fafoe> <3DB5B508.25EC9C14@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:28:56PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > [ ... fabsl() ... ] > > > What standard defines this thing, which g++ has as a built-in? > > > > > > Alternately, the use could avoid adding the "-fno-builtin", and > > > the problem would go away. > > > > ISO C99 > > > > 7.12.7.2 The fabs functions > > #include <math.h> > > long double fabsl(long double x); > > The answer, then, is that FreeBSD is not fully compliant with ISO > C99, although there is work in progress to add compliance. AFAIK, FreeBSD contains none of the long double math.h functions. I also suspect that many of the complex.h functions aren't implemented, yet. > > I personally don't understand why the avoidance of the built-in. > Can you selectively turn off the memcpy, etc. built-in functions? -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021022204143.GA18064>