From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 28 14:47:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7591065672 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrea@brancatelli.it) Received: from mela.raged.it (brancatelli.it [84.233.228.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831198FC23 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.193] (static-217-133-85-183.clienti.tiscali.it [217.133.85.183]) by mela.raged.it (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8SEKaWe029591 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:20:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andrea@brancatelli.it) Message-ID: <4AC0C637.4010800@brancatelli.it> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:20:39 +0200 From: Andrea Brancatelli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org References: <20090928120004.6EAF710656B7@hub.freebsd.org> <44843e1b0909280538x217be446q17115d9169c4270c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44843e1b0909280538x217be446q17115d9169c4270c@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94/9843/Mon Sep 28 04:23:36 2009 on mela.raged.it X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_HEADERS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mela.raged.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: freebsd-advocacy Digest, Vol 295, Issue 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:47:04 -0000 Il 28/09/2009 14.38, Kevin Hatfield ha scritto: > The simplest most effective way to grow the FreeBSD userbase is > indemnification. Large companies that purchase RHEL/SuSE, etc. It's > not because they "don't know what they're doing" as someone mentioned > above. Most of the large Enterprise RHEL/SUSE contracts come down to > indemnification with support being a bonus. > > I strongly agree and also share my personal experience in deploying a massive system (3600 distributed boxes) in which Red Hat was adopted and FreeBSD (even if the project would actually work better under FreeBSD) just becase "if we run out of ideas we can always call red hat italy". This is a huge problem.....