Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:00:24 -0400 From: Coleman <cokane@cokane.org> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Cc: Alex Lyashkov <shadow@psoft.net> Subject: Re: Network interface RUNNING and UP flags Message-ID: <1092081623.65806.3.camel@schemer> In-Reply-To: <20040807092347.GB39835@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <346a8022040806145018a5e18@mail.gmail.com> <1091862376.7840.3.camel@berloga.shadowland> <20040807092347.GB39835@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Seems to work in both -RELEASE and -CURRENT, though I needed to manually apply the patch as line numbers were off in -RELEASE. I can see how the locking could become a problem in -CURRENT. On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 05:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 10:06:17AM +0300, Alex Lyashkov wrote: > > > > not better move this under tp->tap_mtx mutex without using splX > > functions? > > ...especially taking into account that splX do nothing > in CURRENT anyway. Mutex locking framework adopted by > the interface driver should be used of course.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1092081623.65806.3.camel>