From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 03:30:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6426D16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 03:30:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3225A43D46 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 03:30:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1D3UDxm028119 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 03:30:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1D3UDtQ028117; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 03:30:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 03:30:13 GMT Message-Id: <200602130330.k1D3UDtQ028117@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Subject: Re: docs/93039: remove articles/java-tomcat X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 03:30:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/93039; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Sam Lawrance Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/93039: remove articles/java-tomcat Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:22:42 +0200 On 2006-02-08 15:53, Sam Lawrance wrote: > As described in my recent mail to the freebsd-doc@ list, the > java-tomcate article is no longer relevant and even a bit > misleading. I guess it's probably ok to remove it. Keeping out of date docs around is sometimes worse that not having documentation at all about specific topics, because it makes a bad impression about the rest of the docs too. If the rest of the -doc guys also think this article has served us well, but is no longer useful and may even be misleading, then please go ahead and remove it. - Giorgos