Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 15:34:01 -0800 (PST) From: Snob Art Genre <ben@narcissus.ml.org> To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> Cc: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970326153344.1779A-100000@narcissus.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970327100025.18394q-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, dennis wrote: > > > At 09:48 AM 3/27/97 +1100, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > > >On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, dennis wrote: > > > > > >> You guys ever think of doing a patch release (like a single tarball with > > >> the changes) for those of us that spent 2 days setting up 2.2R? > > > > > >Yes, I have. To upgrade to 2.2.1, I'll be fetching bin/*, unpacking, rm > > >-rf etc dev, repack, then untar with --unlink and -p. > > > > Are the only changes in bin? What about the source to the kernel modules? > > dont you need ssys also? > > Yes, you are right. The 2.2.1 README clearly states that there are > kernel changes also, esp the 2940 code. > > The principle remains the same - /etc does not get clobbered. Why not? /etc is part of the bin dist. > Danny > Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.970326153344.1779A-100000>