From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 3 17:08:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D535F265; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.hamcom.de (mail.hamcom.de [212.37.37.215]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2A527E2; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.208.172.72] (port=54088 helo=birne.dunkelkammer.void) by mail.hamcom.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vd0gg-0004k5-2o; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:38:06 +0100 Received: by birne.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 13A12118E9; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:38:05 +0100 (CET) X-HeLi-id: cfcd208495d565ef66e7dff9f98764da Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:38:04 +0100 From: Stefan Walter To: Andrej Zverev Subject: Re: svn commit: r332623 - head/mail/spamprobe Message-ID: <20131103163804.GA1242@birne.dunkelkammer.void> References: <201311031621.rA3GLHqh042299@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Spam-Flag: NO Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:08:03 -0000 Andrej Zverev, 03.11.13, 17:27h CET: > Why not such way? > > +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 1000024 > +USE_GCC= yes > +.endif Because that does not compile, either: https://redports.org/~stefan/20131103163400-45978-156961/spamprobe-1.4d_7.log Regards, Stefan